Antike, Glanzpunkte der Sammlung griechischer und romischer Kunst aus dem Hause Hessen (Fulda 2005)

Antike, Glanzpunkte der Sammlung griechischer und romischer Kunst aus dem Hause Hessen (Fulda 2005)

On the identification of Nero Iulius and his portrait typology (“Adolphseck-Malibu” type), I agree essentially with Klaus Fittschen (1987) 215-17

Kersauson, K. de. Catalogue des portraits romains I: Portraits de la Republique et d’epoque Julio-Claudienne (Musee du Louvre) (Paris 1986).

Pekary, T. Das romische Kaiserbildnis sopra Staat, Kult und Gesellschaft dargestellt anhand der Schriftquellen (Das romische Herrscherbild 3) (Berlin 1985).

Pollini, J. “Man or God: Divine Assimilation and Imitation con the Late Republic and Early Principate,” mediante Between Republic and Colmare: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, edd. K.A. Raaflaub and M. Toher (Berkeley 1990) 333-63.

Pollini, J. “The Gioia Augustea: Ideology, Rhetorical Imagery, and the Creation of verso Dynastic Nararive, per Narrative and Event per Ancient Art (Cambridge 1993), addirittura. P.J. Holliday (Cambridge 1993) 258-98.

Pollini, J. From Republic sicuro Commuovere: Rhetoric, Religion, and Power sopra the Visual Culture of Ancient Rome (Norman, Okla. 2012).

Richter, G.M.Verso. The Portraits of the Greeks I (Ithaca 1965) 109-119; The Portraits of the Greeks (abridged and revised by R.R.R. Smith) (Oxford 1984) 198-204.

Sargent, M.L. and R.H. Therkildsen, “The Technical Investigation of Sculptural Polychromy at the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek 2009-2010 – An Outline’,” in J.S. Ostergaard, ed., Tracking Colour. The polychromy of Greek and Roman Sculpture sopra the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek. Preliminary Report 2 (Copenhagen 2010); also online:

Footnotes

See Chapter VIII, “The ‘Insanity’ of Caligula or the ‘Insanity’ of the Jews? Differences sopra Perception and Religious Beliefs,” con Pollini (2012) 369-411. For the confusion between worshiping the Genius or Numen of the living Princeps (emperor) and worshiping the living person, see also in this same rete informatica Chapter VII, “The Smaller Foro (‘Vicomagistri’) Reliefs and Imperial Julio-Claudian Imperial Altars: Limitations of the Evidence and Problems mediante Interpretation,” 309-68.

See, for example, Wilkinson (2005), especially his excellent concluding chapter (187-94) “Inventing the Mad Emperor, ” and Winterling (2011). For verso different point of view, see con this symposium Vasily Rudich’s paper, “On the Reputation of Little-Boots.”

There has been little agreement mediante the past on the cast of characters on this great cameo. See now especially Megow (1987) 202-207 (cat. A 85) pls. 32.5-10, 33.1-5; Boschung (1989) 64-68; Giard (1998); Giuliani and Schmidt (2010).

The closest parallel for the entire fringe of hair of Caligula’s boyhood portrait is that of his father Germanicus on the Gioiello Augustea: Megow (1987) 8-9, pl. 6.5-6; Pollini (1993) 268. This Gemma portrait of Gemanicus is his first known portrait type (“Adoption” type), which dates esatto 4 CE. The forking of the hair over the center of the forehead is also esatto be found per Germanicus’ third portrait type, the so-called “Gabii” type, most likely created at the outset of the Principate of Caligula (here fig. 4). This portrait type of Germanicus was probably intended onesto resemble Tiberius’ last portrait type (per my opinion, the “Chiaramonti” type (Type VI; here fig. 3), created around 31 CE), and Caligula’ first type (here fig. 12a-b), created durante 37 upon his accession as Princeps. For Tiberius’ “Chiaramonti” type, see Pollini (2005) 59, fig. 2, 66-68, pl. 12.3,4. For the identification of Germanicus and his three portrait types, see especially Fittschen (1987) 205-215: cf. Boschung (1993a) 59-61; Rose (1997) 64-65.

Distinguishing the portraiture of Germanicus (15 BCE-19 CE) and that of his two older sons, Nero Iulius (ca. 6-31 CE) and Drusus Iulius (ca. 7-33 CE), has been particularly difficult and much debated (see also the following note). Cf. Boschung (1993a) 64-65; Rose (1997) 66-67. Per my opinion, this type agrees with the portrait of Moro Iulius on the Grand Camee de France (armored figure durante front of Tiberius): See Fittschen (1987) 216-17, fig. 43 (detail). For the Grand Camee, see n. 5 above. A pronounced hooked nose is one of the characteristics of Bruno Iulius’ portrait https://datingranking.net/it/interracialpeoplemeet-review/, which is paired with that of his brother Drusus Iulius on provincial coins of Tiberian date: See especially verso coin of Aphrodisias: See Stucchi (1987) 54-55, fig. 1d (senior member of the paired images Gelso Iulius on left; ultimogenito fidanzato Drusus Iulius on right).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
Hallo. Ada yang bisa kami bantu ?